From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 19 00:04:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9E51E16A4CE; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:04:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com
	[24.172.16.118])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F3F0E43D1F; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:04:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com)
Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4])
	j2J04sXU020259;	Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:04:54 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com)
From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To: james@icionline.ca
In-Reply-To: <c6bf25505031814463222362b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <009401c52bfe$f314c780$9700000a@XGISH>
	<423B581F.1040602@FreeBSD.org>
	<c6bf25505031814463222362b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FBueHFawPIxjvD6g7iPY"
Organization: MarcusCom, Inc.
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:03:58 -0500
Message-Id: <1111190638.41721.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading seems like a hassle...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:04:18 -0000


--=-FBueHFawPIxjvD6g7iPY
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:46 -0700, James Earl wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:37:19 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> w=
rote:
> > James Earl wrote:
> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:10:44 +0100, Kiffin Gish <kiffin.gish@planet.n=
l> wrote:
> > >
> > >>What do others think about this? Isn't there another less painful way=
 possible? Am I doing something wrong?
> > >
> > >
> > > You're supposed to plan a day trip around the time your run the
> > > gnome_upgrade script!  :)
> > >
> > > On a serious note...  Perhaps it might be possible to add an option t=
o
> > > the gnome_upgrade script to allow it to check the GNOME Tinderbox for
> > > pre-compiled packages and use them if they are available.  This would
> > > speed up the upgrade in a major way.
> >=20
> > If you set PORTUPGRADE in your environment to be (or include) "-P", it
> > will attempt to install fetch and install packages instead of building
> > ports.
>=20
> And point PACKAGESITE to the GNOME Tinderbox, right?

Yes.

Joe

>=20
> James
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

--=-FBueHFawPIxjvD6g7iPY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCO2xub2iPiv4Uz4cRAum9AJ4wjo+Tpf+iD1fEHizzdVXLy0vt2wCgqEv3
eiW10e26K67i88SW/cUjLlk=
=sKUR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-FBueHFawPIxjvD6g7iPY--