From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Sep 12 20:33:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA12676
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 20:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (ppp-206-170-5-59.rdcy01.pacbell.net [206.170.5.59])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA12603
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA05580; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 20:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609130332.UAA05580@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: Adam David <adam@veda.is>
cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: heads up! - /bin/rdisc to die 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Sep 1996 02:51:45 GMT."
             <199609130251.CAA02193@veda.is> 
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 20:32:27 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I was mulling that over... it also means making it static ... sigh. :-(
Opinions? Votes?

I think the bloat of making routed static sucks less than having two programs
that need maintenance, IMO.

Paul

  From: Adam David <adam@veda.is>
  Subject: Re: heads up! - /bin/rdisc to die
  >Yup, that was my intent.
  
  >  From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
  >  Subject: Re:  heads up! - /bin/rdisc to die
  >  When you kill rdisc, please document "-P no_rip" in /etc/sysconfig to make
  >  routed behave as just an rdisc client.
  
  So should routed be moved from /usr/bin to /bin also at around the same time?
  
  Adam