Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 21:43:35 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: Steve Sims <SimsS@IBM.Net>, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.nodak.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPP with network address translation Message-ID: <32AE4A07.167EB0E7@whistle.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961211112301.252K-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > Next question with the PPP Nat, is: who is going to hack this to work > with divert(4) sockets, so we can have a NAT box on ethernet, without the > need for a PPP link? > > Danny that's what we do here.. (why we wrote divert sockets actually) but it;s inherrently kinked with the proprietary part of our system so we can't just give it away. (we'd like to however). but it really is a simple job. we're hoping someone just 'does it' as our hands are tied on this one.. sos BTW has a purely in-kernel version of NAT (or is it HAT?) ours is a process that works on packets that come up via the divert sockets.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32AE4A07.167EB0E7>