From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 12:05:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9C216A4B3; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.fillmore-labs.com (lima.fillmore-labs.com [62.138.193.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F4043FB1; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:05:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from pd951ac23.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.81.172.35] helo=fillmore-labs.com ident=fn6pmrwilfrlgv5t) by mx2.fillmore-labs.com with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.22) id 19zhcB-0009Nc-03; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:05:23 +0200 Message-ID: <3F68B06F.8080107@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:05:19 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" References: <3F68A006.40203@fillmore-labs.com> <20030917185042.GA6336@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030917185042.GA6336@madman.celabo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH X-Complaints-To: abuse@fillmore-labs.com cc: FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port of NetBSD's audit-packages (and an update of pkg_install) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 19:05:27 -0000 Hi Jacques >>I want to port NetBSD's security/audit-packages to FreeBSD. The system is >>described in: >> > > FYI, I'm working on something similar but different ;-) It should see > the light of day before the end of this month. Normally I wouldn't > discourage such ports, but in this case we will be requiring package > maintainers to maintain a database, and There Can Be Only One. Ok, PR 56961 in an improvement even without the audit-packages system. Maybe you can tell me more about your system and how it differs from security/audit-packages? Thanks Oliver