From owner-freebsd-arch  Sun Mar 16 16:57:40 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F63537B401
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7CD43FBD
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:57:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920)
	id 4B43E2ED407; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:57:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:57:38 +0100
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: WARNS=6 changes
Message-ID: <20030317005738.GN3819@elvis.mu.org>
References: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org> <20030316062315.GA75492@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpof4bcu8b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzpllzfctbx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030316234507.GK3819@elvis.mu.org> <xzpznnuq2xw.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030317001100.GM3819@elvis.mu.org> <xzpbs0a95mz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xzpbs0a95mz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> writes:
> > If you really want to see the job done fast, you could have let me
> > commit the patch I posted on arch@ to begin with.  Alternately, you
> > could show me how your patch does things better than mine, and how the
> > issues Bruce and I raised are wrong.
> 
> Bruce wants a solution where time stopped in late 1989 or early 1990.
> You want a solution which will break everything that isn't c99-ready
> yet.  I suggested a solution which will allow those parts of the tree
> which we know are safe to take advantage of GCC's c99 support without
> breaking the rest of the tree.  This is generally known as "mechanism,
> not policy".
> 
> I don't suppose you've tried to build world with -std=c99 in CFLAGS?
> I have.  It doesn't work.

You must have not read my patch correctly.  The only difference it
causes is for WARNS=6 programs.  It does not break the tree at all,
and I do have tested it.

Cheers,
Maxime

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message