Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:01:47 -0400 From: cjm88@home.com To: Nuno Teixeira <nuno.teixeira@pt-quorum.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: looking for the best and complete bench program Message-ID: <3B01C36B.E917A9BD@home.com> References: <20010515224409.R80951-100000@gateway.bogus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I tried ubench out of the ports tree and found it to be reasonably good for relative comparisons... mind you I did make sure that I compiled it once on one machine and then used the same binary as I went from box to box. Based on simple calculations I found the benchmark result scaled with clock frequency so I was able to establish reative performance for CPU and memory for boxes ranging from 486-2/66 to P90, P180, Dual P100 Dual P166, Athon 1.13GHx and so on. The results that were generated made sense. ubench is a bit buggy but it does try to normalize for dual cpu configurations. C Nuno Teixeira wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello to all, > > I'd like to know what is the best or more complete benchmark program that > you know and use on FreeBSD. > > I'm interested on hardware benchs and not those who make network tests. > > I have tryed the programs in the ports but they are very simple. > > Thanks very much, > > - -- > Nuno Teixeira > Dir. Técnico > pt-quorum.com > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 > > iD8DBQE7AaV1jwdyCmOgT8cRAjxDAJ475Bd00rxFGzxnMZwRLEoYE/lnjQCg5/QA > H0tcgtBOU1ERlhjFeiUe45U= > =1JGC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B01C36B.E917A9BD>