Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:20:25 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: HEADS UP: New gconf key policy Message-ID: <1088040025.91312.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-xFQ9weWJXKU9JWRxFJYq Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please take a look at the latest update to archivers/fileroller, and let me know what you think. This is the new gconf policy I think we need to adopt if we're to survive the upcoming gconf changes in GNOME 2.8 (it's similar to the way we handle OMF files now). This will also make gconf handling much more robust with respect to plists. The one downside I see with this is that we will miss Makefile bugs that prevent proper schema installation. One way around that is to add a pkg-install script to each port that installs gconf schemas, and do gconf registration there. This may be more work than it's worth, though. What are people's thoughts on this? Thanks. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-xFQ9weWJXKU9JWRxFJYq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA2ixZb2iPiv4Uz4cRAkUhAJ9JXwqU/u6H7ZpGVdg38LQ3seEvFwCfUgER rT8YBEA/6H55iO/I34mPgow= =yI7L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xFQ9weWJXKU9JWRxFJYq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1088040025.91312.14.camel>