From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Feb 12 0: 3:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D054B37B409 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5A143F3F for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:03:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1C83Ija026397; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:03:18 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with UUCP id h1C83IDq026396; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:03:18 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1C7x4aX084642; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:59:04 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200302120759.h1C7x4aX084642@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Terry Lambert , "Gary W. Swearingen" , Rahul Siddharthan , Colin Percival , chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla? (was Re: Okay, I think I need some serious introduction ;-) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:18:02 -0400." <20030211211426.A43952@hub.org> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:59:04 +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THE CC!! M "Marc G. Fournier" writes: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > > > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > > > What needs to be done is various 'cut off points' need to somehow be > > > > established ... for instance, anything dealing pre-4.x should be closed > > > > ... > > > > > > How about putting "policies" in the PR Guidelines something like this: > > > > [ ... time-based, committer interest-based policies ... ] > > > > > The numbers might be too small. > > > > The problem with this approach is that it's possible to ignore > > a PR to make it go away, without the underlying problem being > > repaired/acknowledged. > > And that is different then now, leaving it open? How many PRs right now > contain patches that ppl have 'ignored' and, as a result, are no longer > even relevant to the code? > -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message