From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 8 14:41:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6334E3 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com (aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com [143.166.82.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 521C427B8 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:41:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Loopcount0: from 64.238.244.148 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,839,1367989200"; d="scan'208";a="39387580" Message-ID: <5203AE08.30504@vangyzen.net> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:41:12 -0500 From: Eric van Gyzen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130702 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: J David Subject: Re: unexpected idprio 31 behavior on 9.2-BETA2 and 9.2-RC1 References: <1375737316.96778.10.camel@firkin.mischler.com> <520116DE.8030305@vangyzen.net> <52013992.4050101@vangyzen.net> <5203A90D.6020008@vangyzen.net> In-Reply-To: <5203A90D.6020008@vangyzen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, dave@mischler.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:41:14 -0000 On 08/08/2013 09:19, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 08/06/2013 14:23, J David wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: >>>> on an otherwise idle amd64 system with 4 CPUs. The first command in the >>>> build.log file: >>>> >>>> rm -rf /usr/obj/home/freebsd/tmp >>>> >>>> took over three minutes. It should have taken about three /seconds/. >>>> >>>> "uptime" reported a load average of around 1.00. >>>> "top" showed no threads (user or kernel) using CPU. >>>> "iostat" showed an average of less than 20 tps on ada0. >>>> "rm" was usually in the RUN state. >> We are looking at something similar. Would you be able to try to >> reproduce it using a kernel with: >> >> nooptions SCHED_ULE >> options SCHED_4BSD >> >> to see if it makes a difference? It seems to, but the problem is >> inconsistent enough that I can't be sure. > The 4BSD scheduler does //not// exhibit this problem. I tested with the > latest releng/9.2 (r254054) and an otherwise GENERIC config. To be thorough, I built a GENERIC kernel at the same rev, and it still exhibits the problem. Eric