From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 04:15:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADD416A4D3; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 04:15:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp (watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp [133.80.152.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE0443D2F; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 04:15:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])i2GCFmxD050087; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:15:48 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:14:53 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040316.211453.74706619.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: peter@wemm.org From: Takahashi Yoshihiro In-Reply-To: <200403150741.38591.peter@wemm.org> References: <20040315.175959.11208797.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040315.224828.41670431.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200403150741.38591.peter@wemm.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: peter@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org cc: imp@bsdimp.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/amd64/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/compat/netbsd dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/dev/ct bshw_machdep.c ct.c ct_isa.c src/sys/dev/ncv ncr53c500.c ncr53c500_pccard.c ncr53c500hw.h ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:15:55 -0000 In article <200403150741.38591.peter@wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes: > I don't really care where they go, as long as it isn't in the MD include > areas (they are not MD!), and not in sys/. My favorites right now are > dev/pc98/* or compat/pc98/*. I would also like sys/device_port.h to > move there too since it is used by the same group of ct/ncv/nsp/stg > drivers. I repeat that they have NO relations with pc98. So, the above proposals are not acceptable. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro