Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:04:03 -0500 From: Johnny Test <imlegion1111@gmail.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Redundant carp mesh best practices Message-ID: <CACb4B=s1c6k=-g9p-6w1j=KRN-pHeR3%2Bp9Mv7bT0VdN4vAPDaw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, I have an ospf mesh running between routers 1, 2, 3 and 4. i have a bridge with a vether running on 1 and 2 each connecting to 3 and 4. i have a trunk running on 3 and 4 each connecting back to the previous 1 and 2. the reason for this setup is the bridge on 1 and 2 faciliates transferring the carp multicast frame between 3 and 4. I’m wondering if this is the current best practice or is there a better way? Image: https://i.redd.it/4i1lu4aeydzb1.jpg Thanks! [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div><span style="color:rgb(28,28,28);font-family:"Noto Sans",Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px">Hi, I have an ospf mesh running between routers 1, 2, 3 and 4. i have a bridge with a vether running on 1 and 2 each connecting to 3 and 4. i have a trunk running on 3 and 4 each connecting back to the previous 1 and 2. the reason for this setup is the bridge on 1 and 2 faciliates transferring the carp multicast frame between 3 and 4. I’m wondering if this is the current best practice or is there a better way?</span><br></div><div><span style="color:rgb(28,28,28);font-family:"Noto Sans",Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(28,28,28);font-family:"Noto Sans",Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px">Image: </span><a href="https://i.redd.it/4i1lu4aeydzb1.jpg" target="_blank">https://i.redd.it/4i1lu4aeydzb1.jpg</a></div><br><div>Thanks!</div></div>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACb4B=s1c6k=-g9p-6w1j=KRN-pHeR3%2Bp9Mv7bT0VdN4vAPDaw>