From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 29 23:14:27 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 46CFE16A4CE; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 23:14:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from everest.sethbc.org (r107647.resnet.cornell.edu
	[128.253.186.248])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8565D43FDF; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 23:14:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sethbc@sethbc.org)
Received: from cwm (r102798.resnet.cornell.edu [128.253.186.154])
	by everest.sethbc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE6052843B; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 02:14:25 -0500 (EST)
From: "Seth Chandler" <sethbc@sethbc.org>
To: "'Steven Hartland'" <killing@barrysworld.com>,
	<obrien@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>,
	"'Robert Cousins'" <rec@RCousins.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 02:14:30 -0500
Message-ID: <000c01c39eb5$76513ad0$9abafd80@cwm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
In-Reply-To: <002a01c39d9b$8fb94000$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Timing of Amd64 & FreeBSD 5.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:14:27 -0000

Is there some sort of checklist for amd64 making Tier 1 for 5.2-RELEASE?

I was under the impression that amd64 already met the requirements for a
tier 1 platform.


seth

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Steven Hartland
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:37 PM
To: obrien@freebsd.org; freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Robert Cousins
Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Timing of Amd64 & FreeBSD 5.2

I must say I'd like to see linux AMD64 support make the grade before 5.2
so we can make use of the hlds_l amd64 compile :)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>

> The largest things missing that a user may notice are SMP support
(don't
> matter to Athlon64 users), Linux AMD64 compatability (not too many
> commercial Linux AMD64 apps at this time), complete FreeBSD/i386
> compatability, complete Linux i386 compatability.


_______________________________________________
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"