From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 12 15:19:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA02358 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 15:19:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mole.mole.org (marmot.mole.org [204.216.57.191]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA02353 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 15:19:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mail@localhost) by mole.mole.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA02255; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 23:20:17 GMT Received: from meerkat.mole.org(206.197.192.110) by mole.mole.org via smap (V1.3) id sma002249; Wed Feb 12 23:19:56 1997 Received: (from mrm@localhost) by meerkat.mole.org (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA10596; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 15:19:04 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 15:19:04 -0800 From: "M.R.Murphy" Message-Id: <199702122319.PAA10596@meerkat.mole.org> To: michaelh@cet.co.jp, snar@lucky.net Subject: Re: Increasing overall security.... Cc: dk+@ua.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Mike, do you think that i published this patches without correct > > check of working ? These patches are applied on my main computers > > about week or so, and i have no problems with... > > ( Well, sendmail 8.8.5 - no problems, too... ) > > I'm sure you checked it. You have to understand that skepticism is a > natural thing. > Were the patches checked WRT denial of service attack? ;-) And all that can lead to...? -- Mike Murphy mrm@Mole.ORG +1 619 598 5874 Better is the enemy of Good