From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 02:25:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D35016A420; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 02:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411E743D46; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 02:25:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k112P204027899; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:25:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:25:02 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Sean McNeil In-Reply-To: <7B0411F5-FCBC-40BC-94CA-2B8AA13FA783@mcneil.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: Robert Watson , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC of bump in libcom_err.so another mistake? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:25:05 -0000 On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote: > > The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the - > CURRENT tree. There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason > for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE. IMHO, it didn't make > sense. I don't think it was -stable at the time. It was probably 6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the release. As a -current user, you are expected to be able to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary. -- DE