From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 20:27:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610B216A4CE for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:27:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ambrisko.com (mail.ambrisko.com [64.174.51.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E58E43D55 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:27:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from server2.ambrisko.com (HELO www.ambrisko.com) (192.168.1.2) by mail.ambrisko.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2005 12:27:15 -0800 Received: from ambrisko.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.ambrisko.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0CKRE0H076547; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:27:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: (from ambrisko@localhost) by ambrisko.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j0CKRE5B076546; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:27:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ambrisko) From: Doug Ambrisko Message-Id: <200501122027.j0CKRE5B076546@ambrisko.com> In-Reply-To: <20050108195947.DE5B62BF1C@mx5.roble.com> To: Roger Marquis Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:27:14 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LSI 1030, RAID1 unsupported X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:27:15 -0000 Roger Marquis writes: | On Sun May 23 2004 Scott Long wrote: | >The mpt and amr drivers are largely unmaintained right now as LSI | >no longer sponsors an engineer to take care of them. I'm not sure | >what else to say about that other than we would gladly accept a new | >maintainer. | | Is this likely to change in the foreseeable future? I just put | together an IBM e325 and discovered that the LSI 1030's performance | in RAID1 mode is abominable (5.3-RELEASE-p4, amd64, with Fujitsu | MAP3367NCs). Make sure your system isn't in background init mode etc. Of course I don't know how to do this without LSI monitoring utitilies. Complain to LSI the need for this. Without the various utilities and versions with fixed bugs you can't run a reliable RAID (ie. won't get RAID notificatioin that a drive went away, it is doing a consistancy check, etc). The more people that complain then hopefully we can get LSI to fix their binary only utilities that are required to monitor and admin. their RAID controller :-( I messured the amr RAID controller is faster for everything then aac on the same HW and drives under RAID 10. Doug A.