From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 21:25:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id E75541065673; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:25:28 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: Roman Divacky Message-ID: <20080418212528.GU25623@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200804161256.56633.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20080416172825.GA81674@freebsd.org> <20080416223801.T19507@ns1.as.pvp.se> <20080416213317.GB25623@hub.freebsd.org> <20080417080047.GC62998@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080417080047.GC62998@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add stubs for Linux 2.6.17 syscalls X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:25:29 -0000 On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > Note that last time I checked we didn't support enough 2.6 syscalls to > > run common binaries though (e.g. a recent fedora rpm(1)). > > can you be more specific? what was missing? I plan to switch to 2.6 > on default quite soon so I wonder... I don't remember, sorry. Try chrooting into a modern fedora installation and see what doesn't work. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe