From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Dec 9 18:37:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24F0C6F930 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailrelay14.qsc.de (mailrelay14.qsc.de [212.99.163.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.antispameurope.com", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3168ED7F for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([213.148.129.14]) by mailrelay14.qsc.de; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 19:37:54 +0100 Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-28-64.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.28.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B183CC42; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:36:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id uB9IaGlq004979; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:36:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:36:16 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Firewalls Message-Id: <20161209193616.63c71b3c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <5bed7716cd0c9f56e7fe73e86d0cde45.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-cloud-security-sender: freebsd@edvax.de X-cloud-security-recipient: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mailrelay14.qsc.de with CFDFD683427 X-cloud-security-connect: mx01.qsc.de[213.148.129.14], TLS=1, IP=213.148.129.14 X-cloud-security: scantime:.1822 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 18:37:30 -0000 On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 09:03:38 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote: > Personally, I'd rather have a system where the firewalls were > modular and did not have to be in the base. Then we could have only one > in base, which would probably be IPFW, and others could be installed > from ports. (Yes, this is non-trivial.) A situation similar to sendmail or lpr would be nice: A functional component is included in the base system, but the user can still choose to install an alternative from ports and use that instead if he wishes _not_ to use the component supplied with the OS. That doesn't make it less non-trivial, but more appealing. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...