From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 21:07:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA241065676; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:07:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from mx0.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2a01:4f8:101:5343::aa]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A1E8FC1C; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mx0.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B9BC2A28CF3; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:07:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:07:11 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20110603210711.GE50646@hoeg.nl> References: <20110603204358.GC50646@hoeg.nl> <4DE94AD7.6060007@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NQFQLHPkFLmdEfVA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DE94AD7.6060007@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Garrett Cooper , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: llimport(8): Import lastlog into utmpx X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:07:12 -0000 --NQFQLHPkFLmdEfVA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Doug, * Doug Barton , 20110603 22:57: > FWIW I'm not enthusiastic about either option. I definitely don't > think an rc.d script is desirable, since it would be run at every > boot for what (if I understand it correctly) is a one-time thing. > More or less the same argument applies to adding this to mergemaster. True. I just looked at mergemaster, but adding it to mergemaster could be unreliable. Say, you're running mergemaster on a different destdir, it would call llimport from the host system, meaning it uses the user database (and byte order) of the host, instead of the target. > In my mind the best way to handle this would be to add it to tools/ > and let users who need it access it that way. But perhaps I'm missing > something? I could do that as well, but the reason why I picked the current approach, is because I don't want to cause people to get confused when they upgrade to 9.0, to discover that their lastlog database is `missing'. Groetjes, --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --NQFQLHPkFLmdEfVA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN6Uz/AAoJEG5e2P40kaK76jIP/2+MD96eK5Mc0QQXUANK81oy ypIxQDycR1zU87Lo+86lQPFLGUSO/6h+p0XEdaymm3yh+k+Czr4pyZe0IGng7AZO AvttSXs5rlulXkUmwZP2IAqNdzJ1uvzuTaHMIPOnSoHPj8MJEWAaHtsCKzZ5+og4 GccKiLhEP9Exf6v5qnw+w2pmYqjxvns4DIpN/DHoLxFrm0hZPL37Wyz5Ez+BclEO EYmgmbuW5HhE6ccV7dQy4iLgvnRO3bVKkIPU/Rk4BbbRvG5P/Gatccr4mKoSuPih 59oMlwzPheAg1UkUImS518bF3d7wjBS3+mL2NTuohhGPVerQRaMRME2bWimR8HZz NDByBQM3x51vSTByCX2PH2JU6yjIW28Nl21rKXQUD19BRYs9RPWF2uQWsUEaru2v jpPT59bDw3DUYfbXIwzbm2L/kitGMXfJl/Bb0L0I5jVOnvuuuZlNPNHQE57HkfFP y+1lYZQn+2DNi7JKHOHr6dsU5UQ6HscWbsK2zlBHavWauvnss1ZkJNyW0NRs4wSo xjyQoBRC+eCCDIEFX8Suw3bBIBMEsxYESj7uMNGN23z08IPWeNCug/VFPlJvj81r J2qCec+a3cdcUc1dVmMvS61hVoPs9CyjGAslNEkM2fWuLPqdj6Y5BaCUpMiAGP+a gcYCMbocqknFNm64dev7 =W6L9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NQFQLHPkFLmdEfVA--