From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 1 10:40:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F4437B401 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id fA1IbJw33629; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:37:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:37:19 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: John Merryweather Cooper Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem building smbfs module, any hint ? Message-ID: <20011101103719.N23297@iguana.aciri.org> References: <20011101101325.L23297@iguana.aciri.org> <20011101102250.E63936@johncoop.MSHOME> <20011101102553.M23297@iguana.aciri.org> <20011101103344.M63936@johncoop.MSHOME> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011101103344.M63936@johncoop.MSHOME> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I believe you are wrong, at least as to -STABLE. Anyway, that's where > that header comes from, you don't have it and SMBFS won't build without > it. ok, thanks for the hint. I still think there is a bug in the dependency then, because at least from what i have seen when KLDfying other modules, you make sure that your kernel contains all is needed for later loading the module. I.e. code depending on option FOO is changed from #ifdef FOO #include #endif .... #ifdef FOO
#endif to #include .... if (foo_is_loaded) {
} ... Do you know which files depend on the option you mentioned ? cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message