From owner-freebsd-bluetooth@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 06:58:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8449E106564A for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plunky@rya-online.net) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0C58FC08 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0B9DEC1E; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:58:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D6r8KZDr1KHj; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:58:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from galant.ukfsn.org (unknown [89.195.130.65]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEA0DEC19; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:58:12 +0100 (BST) Received: by galant.ukfsn.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 12E5E26015B; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:57:59 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:57:58 +0100 (BST) From: Iain Hibbert To: Alexander Best In-Reply-To: <20110328001258.GA70156@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <20110328001258.GA70156@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (NEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Subject: Re: l2ping(8) and -f switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Using Bluetooth in FreeBSD environments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:58:15 -0000 On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Alexander Best wrote: > thus i believe making the -f switch only accessable to super-users (in > accordance with ping(8)/ping6(8)) would increase security. what stops the user from recompiling l2ping without this restriction? iain