From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 25 06:23:27 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A3116A41C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 May 2005 06:23:27 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from qhwt+fbsd@les.ath.cx)
Received: from les.ath.cx (15.61.205.61.west.global.alpha-net.ne.jp
	[61.205.61.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A8D43D1D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 May 2005 06:23:27 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from qhwt+fbsd@les.ath.cx)
Received: by les.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C99631B8762; Wed, 25 May 2005 15:23:25 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:23:25 +0900
From: YONETANI Tomokazu <qhwt+fbsd@les.ath.cx>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050525062325.GA49706@les.ath.cx>
References: <20050524034618.GA62892@crodrigues.org>
	<20050524133204.GA49389@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050524133204.GA49389@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Subject: Re: Kernel compilation errors with GCC 4.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 06:23:27 -0000

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:32:04PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
> dfly has just imported gcc40 into the tree, and I think their infracstructure
> for more than one gcc in tree is nice and usefull..

No it hasn't, it's gcc-3.4.4 that has just been imported.  And here's
the related discussion why it's not gcc-4 yet:
  http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/submit/2005-05/msg00034.html

A patch for gcc-4 has been posted to the same list for anyone to review.

Cheers.