From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 21:57:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B149A106566C; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548758FC0A; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so3309603vcb.13 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:57:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6DAMj0gWvIS1rR+3NVVgPeigVcCJ64Hm3EWXwdttP1U=; b=YUmNBdkBl0NM3CqgjW6yleF6sNUtTsRKF0djXE5w+6iomqEdZhKJr9g+qqtybHiPjv b0MzB1++iIiVoUBYN5PC+FogkRqn/wKdWcSgnrsoFLTo4/7Z4QoW+MDLZffXJiJ79Y3J 5uuUOkO8ELen6VOCD+KzUpCFKYdwOiFCN9DrE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.199.135 with SMTP id es7mr1141112vcb.95.1321912668494; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:57:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.29.198 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:57:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20111121131730.GA3599@freebsd.org> <20111121152054.GA22220@freebsd.org> <20111121214732.GA8566@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:57:48 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ib_2VBncmkFrRv7oPKMcPYLsy18 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issues with the recent ath commits (r227740, r227651, ...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:57:49 -0000 There's nothing especially special in either of those. I think it's likely the wrong lock in msleep() that I've just posted a patch for to the mailing list. Please test that out and let me know how it goes. (Ok, ok, I'll acquire another eeepc just to use with legacy non-11n nics..) adrian