From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Jan 27 17:32:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA06471 for alpha-outgoing; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:32:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pike.cdrom.com (pike.cdrom.com [204.216.28.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA06414 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:32:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@pike.cdrom.com) Received: from localhost (murray@localhost) by pike.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA01927; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:24:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@pike.cdrom.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:24:27 -0800 (PST) From: Murray Stokely To: Yura Socolov cc: Jacques Vidrine , freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD/Alpha Web page In-Reply-To: <19980127181540.32762@matrix.binary.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 27 Jan 1998, Yura Socolov wrote: % Perhaps. Don't Intel's processors account for 100% of all processors % installed in Compaq's boxes though? Compaq made a lot of money with the Cyrix media-gx processor in its low end boxes and just announced a ton of new desktop computers using AMD K6's instead of Intels. I believe it was something like 40% of this quarters new models were using non-intel chips. Granted they are all the lower end, less profitable models, but they are non-intel boxes none the less. Murray Stokely