Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:31:46 +0200 From: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua> To: ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org>, spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Experimental 3D HW accel support for Radeon HD 2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx, 2nd! Message-ID: <20091223053146.GA89371@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in > > order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added > > just after 2.4.12 and the bits that broke nouveau were just before > > 2.4.13... > > Ah, I just see! ABI breakage is building issue, I confirmed: > > I think simple-fully xf86-video-nouveau updating at the same > time. Please see also attached patch. I confirmed that > compile is OK. But I don't have any GeForce video cards. > So I don't know any problems of updating it in real. > > And do you have any recommendation of GeForce? e.g. 9800GTX, > GT260, ... I'll get one and test. I'm interested in Cuda > and nvidia binary driver, too. > > P.S. libdrm was update to 2.4.17, so I'll update... I just tested libdrm 2.4.17 with --enable-radeon-experimental-api and mesalib git master. It's work quite good. Well, it worked quite good before "Merge branch 'glsl-pp-rework-2'" (e195eab9093d2a6cf55a42b2e7789c9a381b778) but this is separate matter. So may be enabling libdrm_radeon is not such a bad idea. -- Adios
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091223053146.GA89371>