From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 17 6:19:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7D937B401 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 06:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web1.nexusinternetsolutions.net (web1.nexusinternetsolutions.net [206.47.131.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5AE143E3B for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 06:19:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@hawk-systems.com) Received: (qmail 55038 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2002 13:19:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ws1) (24.157.103.51) by web1.nexusinternetsolutions.net with SMTP; 17 Sep 2002 13:19:09 -0000 From: "Dave [Hawk-Systems]" To: "Troy Settle" , "'Ralph Huntington'" Cc: "'Drew Tomlinson'" , Subject: RE: Fw: FrontPage 2002 Extensions Help Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:19:06 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <002101c25e4a$286bf5f0$2615c518@psknet.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >I too have had nothing but trouble getting Apache/mod_ssl/frontpage >working. I can get apache+mod_ssl, or apache+frontpage working, but not >all 3. However, from what you posted, I'd say that your errors are the >result of a configuration error. > >Ralph, > >Are you saying that you got all 3 to work together? If so, how did you >do it? Do you have some notes that you could share? > We did this with 4.3 stable about a year ago... I don't know if things have changed with recent versions, but I remember having to essentially patch all the files manually, and spend a few days tinkering to get it to work stable enough to host the one client we initilly installed it for. End result is FPX wasn't stable enough for me to recommend it for anyone else on our servers. Recommended they look for existing NT box and NT tech with their next competitor acquisition... Let that box crash and burn, and that tech worry about it. I do wish that the apache-fp port was a little more inclusive of some of the other "mandatory" additions for hosting without hacking the patches all to pieces. In the meantime, recommend let MS people host on an MS server... at least then we can include a disclaimer for relibility purposes on those boxes. If this has changed recently, MAY be willing to give it another go on a spare box. Anything over and hour to fiddle with though just isn't worth it IMO. Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message