From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 31 00:42:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D180016A401 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stable@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A5213C461 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stable@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0V0gY8v013769; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:42:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stable@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0V0gY79013768; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:42:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stable@museum.rain.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:42:34 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French Message-ID: <20070131004234.GA13590@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20070130120050.899B816A4BF@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070130120050.899B816A4BF@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:42:35 -0000 > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:02:52 +0000 > From: Pete French > Subject: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ? > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, max@love2party.net > Cc: rcoleman@criticalmagic.com, bms@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > > > 1) You use the interface name as address w/o dynamic lookup. > > i.e. "... from stf0 ..." > > Yes, thats it - I hadn't come across this 'dynamic lookup' thing before > though, so I didn't realise what it was. I still cant find it in the PF > manual, aside from a reference that you need to do it for NAT. > > > To 1 and 2 there is a simple sollution: Don't do that then! 1 can easily=20 > > be defused by adding parentheses. i.e. "... from (stf0) ...". > > pass out on (stf0) inet6 from any to any keep state Just for my edification, what is the point of "keep state" on an "any-to-any" rule? Jim