From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 12 03:23:49 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA08157 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 03:23:49 -0700 Received: from mail.barrnet.net (mail.BARRNET.NET [131.119.246.7]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA08142 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 03:23:33 -0700 Received: from hq.icb.chel.su (icb-rich-gw.icb.chel.su [193.125.10.34]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.6.10/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id DAA04120 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 03:20:21 -0700 Received: from localhost (babkin@localhost) by hq.icb.chel.su (8.6.5/8.6.5) id QAA00323; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 16:17:48 -0500 From: "Serge A. Babkin" Message-Id: <199504122117.QAA00323@hq.icb.chel.su> Subject: SLIP bug ? To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 16:17:48 -0500 (GMT-0500) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503230451.UAA02437@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Mar 22, 95 08:51:37 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 343 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have found a little bug in SLIP (950210-SNAP). Comment says that SLIP must mask both network and tty interrupts by spl...(), but really it masks splimp() only. Is this error corrected in -current ? If not I can submit a diff. Serge Babkin ! (babkin@hq.icb.chel.su) ! Headquarter of Joint Stock Bank "Chelindbank" ! Chelyabinsk, Russia