From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat May 11 14:23:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A748A159E0FD for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 14:23:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AFD8ABBD for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 14:23:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DA26F159E0FC; Sat, 11 May 2019 14:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A60159E0FB for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 14:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194258ABB1; Sat, 11 May 2019 14:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CF95.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.207.149]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x4BENQLw072456 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 11 May 2019 16:23:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id x4BENPim035809; Sat, 11 May 2019 16:23:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x4BEND1t058226; Sat, 11 May 2019 16:23:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201905111423.x4BEND1t058226@fire.js.berklix.net> To: FreeBSD Core Team cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Core: Yes please, Code of Conduct committee: No Thanks. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs http://stolenvotes.uk User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 09 May 2019 22:24:26 -0300." <868svf6r05.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 16:23:13 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 194258ABB1 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.38)[0.380,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.42)[0.423,0]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-0.08)[asn: 33824(-0.40), country: DE(-0.01)]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[slim.berklix.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[68.90.185.94.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.23)[0.225,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[149.207.82.46.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 14:23:44 -0000 FreeBSD Core Team Secretary wrote: > The FreeBSD Core Team is aware of recent controversial statements made > on social media by a FreeBSD developer. We, along with the Code of > Conduct review committee, are investigating the matter and will decide > what action to take. Both the Core Team and the FreeBSD Foundation > would like to make it clear that views shared by individuals represent > neither the Project nor the Foundation. Core@ statements always welcome. But Code of Conduct committee merit no automatic credence since: Code of Conduct aims were cloned from an ultra feminist group of non FreeBSD members, part paid by foundation, then shoved on FreeBSD before discussion, by a voluble few in FreeBSD The new CoC terms were hotly disputed. core@ failed to remove it before many tuned out, despairing of the politics [& lack of core@ backbone, probably themselves scared of being labeled anti-whatever], New CoC putch-ists took seats on CoC FreeBSD had a CoC before the putch with the new feminist etc CoC. https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html CoC could be replaced with the old one from SVN, or from https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Consultant Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich Aachen Kent http://stolenvotes.uk Brexit ref. stole votes from 700,000 Brits in EU. Lies bought; Groups fined; 1.9 M young had no vote, 1.3 M old leavers died.