From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Mar 29 10:19:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA08108
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.think.com (Mail1.Think.COM [131.239.33.245])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA08096
          for <current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Early-Bird-1.Think.COM by mail.think.com; Fri, 29 Mar 96 13:19:08 -0500
Received: from compound ([206.10.99.151]) by Early-Bird.Think.COM; Fri, 29 Mar 96 13:19:05 EST
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound (8.6.12/8.6.112) id MAA24109; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 12:19:40 -0600
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 12:19:40 -0600
Message-Id: <199603291819.MAA24109@compound>
From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM>
To: current@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon..  
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

   From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
   Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:04:24 -0500

   > Why do ns_addr() and iso_addr() have to go?  What's the big deal?

   Because the network address families they supported are no longer
   shipped, and thus they won't compile any more.

Please, that isn't good enough to justify the cost.  Stub them to
return errors.