From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 3 17:13:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2478316A400 for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7271513C465 for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 17:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 May 2007 17:13:09 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 03 May 2007 19:13:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/jgVY7CGbjQffMbGXVZsNMgqhTXdxGe+Cd/Idda9 +9kjaLR3SlgHIi Message-ID: <463A180D.9030303@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:12:45 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mal content References: <20070502193159.GB42482@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070503023618.GA48256@xor.obsecurity.org> <8e96a0b90705030943w1ed479bei106e0ca1fe5a3eb1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e96a0b90705030943w1ed479bei106e0ca1fe5a3eb1@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 17:13:11 -0000 mal content wrote: >> /usr/local > > Hello. > > Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7? > > thanks, > MC A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the first place. No one was really able to tell weather to put a port into /usr/X11R6 or /usr/local anyway.