From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 16 06:54:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2AC16E for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 06:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@d2ux.net) Received: from mail.s1.d2ux.org (static.209.96.9.5.clients.your-server.de [5.9.96.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4841CC for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 06:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.s1.d2ux.org (mail [10.0.0.3]) by mail.s1.d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FBB84F25CD; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.s1.d2ux.org (mail [10.0.0.3]) by mail.s1.d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09BF84F25CC; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.s1.d2ux.org ([10.0.0.3]) by mail.s1.d2ux.org (mail.s1.d2ux.org [10.0.0.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNsXC0kS3rpF; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:54:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.s1.d2ux.org (unknown [10.0.0.4]) by mail.s1.d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA2784F25C4; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:54:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 188.92.33.51 ([188.92.33.51]) by d2ux.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:54:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 08:54:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20130516085406.Horde.0dWJ4GYVZLWZydTBodhu8g5@d2ux.org> From: Matthias Petermann To: Chris Rees Subject: Re: Multiple Python eggs within one port References: <20130515155738.Horde.zDbx37jZPYOoPydihrwCcA1@d2ux.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.0.4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: python X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 06:54:10 -0000 Hi Chis, Zitat von Chris Rees : > Usually a master/slave configuration is more appropriate. Are you familiar > with those? at least I guess have seen such configurations e.g. for the gnome desktop(?). So do you mean, there is one master port which causes the ~50 ports to build in sequence? This would make sense as an addition to the current approach. My concern was about the number of single ports. Currently, Tryton provides ~50 modules/eggs, for each a single port. Currently we are planning to support 2...3 tryton versions in parallel within the ports. This would even grow this number to ~150. I worked with a committer on this and he mentioned, that portsmgr might be not too happy about such a large number just for a relatively small application. That's why I considered to bundle the eggs into one port. But response from portsmgr is still open, maybe they don't see an issue with this. Best regards, Matthias