From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 1 22:00:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA27363 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 22:00:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ppp1682.on.bellglobal.com (ppp6543.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.208.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA27351 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 22:00:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by ppp1682.on.bellglobal.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA02985; Thu, 2 Apr 1998 00:51:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ppp1682.on.bellglobal.com: tim owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 00:51:06 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: tim@localhost Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: Chuck Robey cc: Brian Cully , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Objective C rules for /usr/share/mk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Chuck Robey wrote: > Sounds fine, I'll see them then. I was somewhat concerned if they were > biased towards one implementation (GNU's Objective C versus objc, for > example). Well, there is a certain system bias already in that we do ship gcc... Similar to the way we ship a particular f77 compiler... -- tIM...HOEk OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names hoping that the resultant code will run faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message