Date: 18 Aug 1999 15:41:27 -0700 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/13205: Dependency updates for lang/egcs Message-ID: <vqcwvusbtk8.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Ade Lovett's message of "Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:24:15 -0500" References: <E11Gofu-0006Zd-00@zen.lovett.com> <vqcaerq11bm.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990817175223.J67778@remarq.com> <vqcaerqyouh.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990818132144.U67778@remarq.com> <vqchflweo39.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990818172415.D72820@remarq.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> * I'm aware of that :) The point I was making is that there is the * possibility that a port will compile and run successfully on -stable * (using gcc295) but might fail on -current (using gcc, assuming the * system compiler isn't the same as USE_NEWGCC). This may or may not * be a bad thing.. I see. Well, David O'Brien is the maintainer of both, and he has stated in the past that they will stay in sync, so I don't think we have to worry about that particular case. * Sorry, the comment was a little tongue-in-cheek (hence the quotes), I'm Ok. But many people will misunderstand what you said, so please be careful. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcwvusbtk8.fsf>