From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 8 11: 3:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F3437B422; Tue, 8 May 2001 11:03:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f48I2u383322; Tue, 8 May 2001 11:02:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: juha@saarinen.org Cc: dmmiller@cvzoom.net, msmith@FreeBSD.ORG, kris@obsecurity.org, nuno.mailinglists@pt-quorum.com, guilherme@nortenet.pt, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: CFLAGS Optimization In-Reply-To: References: <20010508012916Q.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010508110255K.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 11:02:55 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 14 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Well, the perspective, if there is any apart from general curiosity, is > obscured by the lack of documentation. It is documented in /etc/make.conf - the user is instructed to avoid the higher optimization flags. It is impossible to document just what sorts of code might be affected since if we knew gcc's optimizer bugs to that level of detail, we could also FIX the buggers. > It wouldn't hurt, I don't think, to have an alternative to GCC. I'm glad you feel that way. When do you think you'll have the first BETA version of juhacc ready to test? :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message