From owner-cvs-all  Tue Aug  8  7:44:43 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from home.bsdclub.org (home.bsdclub.org [202.227.26.94])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 795DA37B80F; Tue,  8 Aug 2000 07:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sada@bsdclub.org)
Received: (from sada@localhost) by home.bsdclub.org (8.9.3/3.7W)
	id XAA91331; Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:43:55 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:43:55 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200008081443.XAA91331@home.bsdclub.org>
To: andrews@technologist.com
Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, sada@bsdclub.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/xswallow - Imported sources
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 6 Aug 2000 22:53:59 -0400".
	<20000806225359.J29987@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
From: SADA Kenji <sada@bsdclub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.22] 1999-12/19(Sun)
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In article <20000806225359.J29987@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
andrews@technologist.com writes:

>> > BTW addport always needs <directory> argument and I guess "-d" option flag
>> > is redundant.
:
>> Why is -d flag redundant?  Perhaps you mean to use a different
>> adjective?

I tried to say:
<directory> is not an OPTION but an argument which couldn't be ommitted.
So it wouldn't need OPTION FLAG, IMHO.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message