From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 07:53:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5AA16A4CE for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:53:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4567943D95 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:52:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com) Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Ah9nJ-0004kR-Ne; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:52:29 +0000 To: des@des.no, petefrench@keithprowse.com In-Reply-To: Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:52:29 +0000 cc: veldy@veldy.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:53:00 -0000 > Yes. So? ...because thats not what I wanted to do :-) -pcf. [point is moot now anyway as I did things a different way]