From owner-freebsd-net Sat Dec 5 13:07:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA11175 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 13:07:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from messenger.cacheflow.com (messenger.cacheflow.com [208.2.250.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA11170 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 13:07:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krowett@verio.com) Received: from rowettpc (208.2.250.25) by messenger.cacheflow.com (Worldmail 1.3.167); 5 Dec 1998 13:05:02 -0800 Message-Id: <4.1.19981205130639.00a06ac0@pop.ncal.verio.com> X-Sender: krowett@pop.ncal.verio.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 13:08:54 -0800 To: alk@pobox.com, net@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Kevin J. Rowett" Subject: Re: resolver behaviour In-Reply-To: <13929.39477.406338.806610@avalon.east> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Instead, to the best of my current understanding, the resolver >presently returns failure if it encounters a responding nameserver >which reports a negative lookup response. This hardly seems If one nameserver responses name invalid, another responses with an address, which would you consider to be the correct answer? KR To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message