From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Aug 2 09:00:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1FCBACEDC for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es) Received: from cu1176c.smtpx.saremail.com (cu1176c.smtpx.saremail.com [195.16.148.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 047D8196E for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es) Received: from [172.16.8.36] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11]) by proxypop02.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D27499DC72E; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:00:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: NFS on 10G interfaces still painfully slow From: Borja Marcos In-Reply-To: <20160802104929.a10602a4786c68b4547a45b9@aei.mpg.de> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:00:24 +0200 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4D7BC972-D3EF-4BDE-86AD-C88DCFE99362@sarenet.es> References: <20160802104929.a10602a4786c68b4547a45b9@aei.mpg.de> To: =?utf-8?Q?Gerrit_K=C3=BChn?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 09:00:35 -0000 > On 02 Aug 2016, at 10:49, Gerrit K=C3=BChn = wrote: >=20 > Is there anyone around here who can confirm that nfs can go faster = over > 10G links? > Any hints for further tuning/debugging are greatly appreciated. Can you show us ifconfig output, please? Borja.