From owner-freebsd-current Thu Nov 14 00:41:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA24094 for current-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 00:41:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ocean.campus.luth.se (ocean.campus.luth.se [130.240.194.116]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA24087 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 00:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from karpen@localhost) by ocean.campus.luth.se (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA03583; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:46:12 +0100 (MET) From: Mikael Karpberg Message-Id: <199611140846.JAA03583@ocean.campus.luth.se> Subject: Re: (add|rm)(user|group) To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de (Wolfram Schneider) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:46:12 +0100 (MET) Cc: current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199611121553.QAA00777@campa.panke.de> from Wolfram Schneider at "Nov 12, 96 04:53:26 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Wolfram Schneider: > > I did not got a reply for the removeuser, addgroup, and > rmgroup scripts. So I guess they works well ;-) > If nobody objects I will change the -current Makefile > and install the scripts in /usr/sbin/ I haven't looked at them at all, but I thought I'd just comment on their names as you listed them above. addgroup / adduser - seems logical rmgroup / removeuser - not so logical Why not rmuser or removegroup ? I think it would be nice with consistant naming, maybe? /Mikael