From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 22:16:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BDE1065672; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward10.mail.yandex.net (forward10.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748CE8FC0A; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp8.mail.yandex.net (smtp8.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.54]) by forward10.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 852AD1023284; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:36 +0400 (MSD) Received: from smtp8.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 64DFB1B6050C; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:36 +0400 (MSD) Received: from 93.91.0.219.tel.ru (93.91.0.219.tel.ru [93.91.0.219]) by smtp8.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id GaLS0NVq-GaLGDwoF; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:36 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4EA9D843.9050002@passap.ru> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:35 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Sahil Tandon Subject: Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:16:38 -0000 28.10.2011 01:18, Eitan Adler пишет: > Hi, > > A PR came in (ports/161825) with a flash11 port ready to commit. I > have a few questions: > > (a) What should the port be named? Based on my understanding it should > be www/linux-f10-flash11 I'd suggest www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 for a consistency. > (b) Would emulation like to own this port? That's OK for me. > (c) Should flash10 be removed? If so can we eliminate the version > number from the port? I wouldn't do it since flash10 finally works. Let's test the new port for a while. However I'm not an active user of the port. > (d) Can you please provide a general review of the port? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161825 for details. If time permits I'll be glad to, but won't argue if someone do it faster. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve