From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 22 20:51:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 786AE16A4CE; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:51:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
	[128.208.78.105])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3DB7643D58; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:51:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i5MKpjRR001181;	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)i5MKpifb001180;
	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:51:44 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from sgk)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:51:44 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040622205144.GA95050@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <40D7EC48.5010800@alumni.rice.edu>
	<20040622204008.GB800@galgenberg.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040622204008.GB800@galgenberg.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: -Os -> libXaw.so: undefined reference to `.L91'
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:51:46 -0000

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:40:08PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
>                                                    ^^^
> Anyway, if this is a known GCC problem, as mentioned in another post, I
> can only hope that -CURRENT will get a newer gcc snapshot before
> branching to 5-STABLE.
> 

Do you read the -current mailing list?  kan@ is working on an
update for GCC. 

-- 
Steve