From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 11 08:22:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA16344
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 08:22:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA16338
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 08:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA11593; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 08:22:07 -0800 (PST)
To: Fred Gilham <gilham@csl.sri.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFS problem (was Re: Maybe a showstopper, maybe not. ) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Mar 1997 06:59:04 PST."
             <199703111459.GAA03343@japonica.csl.sri.com> 
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 08:22:07 -0800
Message-ID: <11589.858097327@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> (Jaye Mathisen reported an NFS problem, Jordan Hubbard responded,
> asking if there are any others experiencing interoperability problems
> with NFS under 2.2-GAMMA)

Your PR appears to address a different problem - using a multi-homed
server.  I'm not saying it's not a problem, simply that I think it's a
very *different* one and if we could address the problems people are
having with the simple, single-homed server case then I'd personally
be more than happy enough with NFS for 2.2.0.

					Jordan