From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Nov 11 04:26:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA18951
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 04:26:33 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA18943
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 04:26:25 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from brian@awfulhak.org)
Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA12271;
	Tue, 11 Nov 1997 12:13:13 GMT
Message-Id: <199711111213.MAA12271@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Joe McGuckin <joe@via.net>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IP MASQUERADING? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Nov 1997 18:23:15 PST."
             <199711110223.SAA01632@monk.via.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 12:13:13 +0000
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Also, they use linux for a firewall. They clean that FreeBSD cannot do
> IP masquerading. Is this true?

There's a (rather small) section in the FAQ saying that FreeBSD is 
now NAT capable :-)

> -joe

-- 
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>, <brian@FreeBSD.org>, <bri@OpenBSD.org>
      <http://www.Awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....