From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 6 13:25:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0887916A46E; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from BORJAMAR@SARENET.ES) Received: from proxypop1.sarenet.es (proxypop1.sarenet.es [194.30.0.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22CC13C4AA; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from BORJAMAR@SARENET.ES) Received: from localhost (unknown [212.81.200.214]) by proxypop1.sarenet.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2740D5CAC; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:24:27 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5C6AEFD0-FAC0-4E02-A969-D3B2E01DB099@SARENET.ES> From: Borja Marcos To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20071106125552.GO5268@garage.freebsd.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v912) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:24:25 +0100 References: <20071005000046.GC92272@garage.freebsd.pl> <20071008121523.GM2327@garage.freebsd.pl> <20071105215035.GC26730@heff.fud.org.nz> <2e77fc10711051531k41e7224dq6aaedb35cad8d9f2@mail.gmail.com> <6214AB9C-9F9B-4B9D-8B05-0B3DF5F6C16D@SARENET.ES> <20071106100015.GB5268@garage.freebsd.pl> <9A147CEC-D5E6-4117-8C69-16E40DB45B22@SARENET.ES> <20071106125552.GO5268@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.912) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS kmem_map too small. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:25:00 -0000 On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > ZFS volume? You mean ZVOL? Can you paste 'zfs list; zpool status'? Sorry, not a ZVOL, that's been an unfortunate usage of "volume". I created a single pool with all the disks, and I've created ZFS filesystems for /, /var, / usr... Of course I can :) prueba# zpool status pool: pool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 da1s2c ONLINE 0 0 0 da2s2c ONLINE 0 0 0 da3s2c ONLINE 0 0 0 da4s2c ONLINE 0 0 0 da5s2c ONLINE 0 0 0 da6s2c ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors prueba# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pool 30.8G 231G 46.0K /pool pool/expert 36.0K 231G 36.0K /expert pool/home 461K 231G 461K /home pool/root 385M 231G 385M legacy pool/scratch 16.8G 231G 16.8G /pool/scratch pool/swap 32.0K 243G 32.0K - pool/usr 1.63G 231G 1.63G /usr pool/var 52.2M 231G 52.2M /var prueba# If you want me to do some tests, I'm available. Best regards, Borja. ---------------- "The thing he realised about the windows was this: because they had been converted into openable windows after they had first been designed to be impregnable, they were, in fact, much less secure than if they had been designed as openable windows in the first place." Douglas Adams, "Mostly Harmless"