From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 4 17:17:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40767861; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBEB7109A; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id at1so26664943iec.5 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:17:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0Bw1LQO0Ngp7tpQfsKrxA/bt+s56Xk+3atB0f7ZY2Lc=; b=NqE6oEwXvIWZer9sgjqJeGyWAp0vuIFiox2K0XKeDdS3ee72DBBKLO5Fs1cldsmRl4 0rDNbknPCJLUjOT///XmxKp7bK9PnfmSuRT6vxX2mH2HHCSGaNxXkd4DKFNCH4Ls/Asf ur//Rp7wS8i40p//UP4Gy8glAJeUSv78QTP9zfaaLjQEauaRGvfIFUMyYCYgq1ShsWVh jBXYoR/f9n/t0beILutoRsPTD7m5WO/4scQ1J5HyKG/2zFOpRD5yYRRxsC3o3Jcn+fOt 028/h2B9LhwH/+nnKAyEf+E9Gz9wGhcCS6CgJWbEujMhj11qKTKodEa6GXwx5g8iMQqc zMHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.87.36 with SMTP id u4mr2055640igz.40.1386177434369; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:17:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.140.38 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:17:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <529E8C53.6020208@freebsd.org> <20131204060246.GV2951@home.opsec.eu> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:17:14 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BIND segway -> python -> first-class ports From: Tom Evans To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Daniel Eischen , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" , Kurt Jaeger , Julian Elischer X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:17:15 -0000 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Of course, the question of what needs to be a class 1 port may prove to be > the bikeshed to end all bikesheds! (I think we need Python, Perl, JPEG, > PNG, GPG, BIND and bright yellow!) And we need a reasonable mechanism to > update this list as the popularity of various tools does change. Woah, this is missing most of what Alfred was saying. There should be no "class 1 ports", and if jpeg went in base, it should be because base requires and uses it, not because it is useful to 3rd party software in base. The base jpeg *would not* even be visible to ports/3rd party software by default, only to base and things especially configured to use base. Cheers Tom