From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 18 21:16:48 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id VAA11517 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 21:16:48 -0800 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA11510 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 21:16:45 -0800 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id VAA07726; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 21:16:18 -0800 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199501190516.VAA07726@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: No lost+found? To: terry@uivlsi.csl.uiuc.edu (Terry Lee) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1995 21:16:18 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199501182350.AA11404@uivlsi.csl.uiuc.edu> from "Terry Lee" at Jan 18, 95 05:50:44 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 554 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > It seems that FreeBSD doesn't create the lost+found directory for > each UFS file system. Is this by design or an omission? It looks a little > odd since I'm so used to expecting it. But I don't mind as long as it is > harmless. The error here is that newfs does not create lost+found, fsck will create it if it finds that it needs one. > Terry Lee > terry@uivlsi.csl.uiuc.edu -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD