Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Dec 1999 03:25:24 -0500 (EST)
From:      Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>
To:        "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ports/15434: new port: devel/kdevelop
Message-ID:  <XFMail.991228032524.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>
In-Reply-To: <19991223051215U.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22-Dec-99 R. Imura wrote:
>> On 15-Dec-99 R. Imura wrote:
>> >>  >   o The port depends on many other ports. Year, if they are installed,
>> >>  >     kdevelop will be more power-full and we will be happy, but they
>> >>  >     are
>> >>  >     not really **nessesary**.
>> >
>> > It would be. But I meant the following optional RUN_DEPENDS. :)
>> > 
>> > RUN_DEPENDS=  autoconf:${PORTSDIR}/devel/autoconf \
>> 
>> You're both wrong. _THIS_ must be installed for kdevelop to serve any useful
>> purpose at all. Although the rest _are_ optional. ;-)
> 
> You are right!
> What about automake?
># I must modify my port.

No, I don't think so (on automake). You committed kdevelop-i18n without a
required autoconf? (I had to ask. ;)

>> I am still waiting to hear (valid) reasons why the kdelibs11/qt142 ports
>> have not been upgraded.
> 
> You had better send all related patches, if you want.

Sorry I have not been able to reply for several days. I was gone on vacation. I
will upgrade these ports to use NEWGCC and send everything in a few days
Believe me, I have a VERY large number of ports and such based on these ports
being upgraded that are waiting in my cache, in addition to several others.
They just need these KDE + Qt libraries upgraded to compile on -STABLE. Just
like KDevelop.

If I do these patches (for kdelibs11/qt142), will you at least look them over
and consider them for committing? I would most appreciate this.

I will also upgrade KDevelop to the latest version (1.0 final) in this process.
Which would you prefer, diff -urN against submitted port, or new shar?

--
Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ 
G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.991228032524.andrews>