From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 28 0:25:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pluto.psn.net (pluto.psn.net [207.211.58.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA5B14E39 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:25:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@shadow.blackdawn.com) Received: from 15-130.008.popsite.net ([209.69.195.130] helo=shadow.blackdawn.com) by pluto.psn.net with esmtp (PSN Internet Service 3.12 #1) id 122rwf-0007Od-00; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 01:25:30 -0700 Received: (from will@localhost) by shadow.blackdawn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA12452; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 03:25:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from will) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3.1 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19991223051215U.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 03:25:24 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: Will Andrews From: Will Andrews To: "R. Imura" Subject: Re: ports/15434: new port: devel/kdevelop Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 22-Dec-99 R. Imura wrote: >> On 15-Dec-99 R. Imura wrote: >> >> > o The port depends on many other ports. Year, if they are installed, >> >> > kdevelop will be more power-full and we will be happy, but they >> >> > are >> >> > not really **nessesary**. >> > >> > It would be. But I meant the following optional RUN_DEPENDS. :) >> > >> > RUN_DEPENDS= autoconf:${PORTSDIR}/devel/autoconf \ >> >> You're both wrong. _THIS_ must be installed for kdevelop to serve any useful >> purpose at all. Although the rest _are_ optional. ;-) > > You are right! > What about automake? ># I must modify my port. No, I don't think so (on automake). You committed kdevelop-i18n without a required autoconf? (I had to ask. ;) >> I am still waiting to hear (valid) reasons why the kdelibs11/qt142 ports >> have not been upgraded. > > You had better send all related patches, if you want. Sorry I have not been able to reply for several days. I was gone on vacation. I will upgrade these ports to use NEWGCC and send everything in a few days Believe me, I have a VERY large number of ports and such based on these ports being upgraded that are waiting in my cache, in addition to several others. They just need these KDE + Qt libraries upgraded to compile on -STABLE. Just like KDevelop. If I do these patches (for kdelibs11/qt142), will you at least look them over and consider them for committing? I would most appreciate this. I will also upgrade KDevelop to the latest version (1.0 final) in this process. Which would you prefer, diff -urN against submitted port, or new shar? -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message