Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:15:09 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hme(4) broken on non-sparc64 systems in -current Message-ID: <20060321061508.GK31216@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <20060320235732.GA79203@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060320211720.GB31216@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20060320235732.GA79203@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > How about backing out rev. 1.46(if_hme.c)? > For the same patch sent to bard@OpenBSD I got a positive report > so it's strange to me though.(brad@OpenBSD reported Rx checksum > offload breakage on little endian systems.) Yes, backing that out helps. I'm not sure what this change was trying to fix. I've noticed before that tools like ethereal reported the checksum as invalid but the traffic itself was unaffected. Anyway, as it was now, the traffic was blocked, so perhaps there's more than one spot where this needs to be fixed? I'll look a bit further into it tonight. Thanks! -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060321061508.GK31216>