From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Mar 26 5: 6: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592CC37B419; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cjc@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2QD62751594; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:06:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:06:02 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200203261306.g2QD62751594@freefall.freebsd.org> To: spe@internetway.net, cjc@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/17007: This is a code for implementing ethernet firewall under FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: This is a code for implementing ethernet firewall under FreeBSD State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: cjc State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 26 05:01:22 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: I believe "ethfw" is being independently maintained by the author(s) on his(their) own. If there is demand for ethfw in the future, that code is available and this PR will still be in the database for historical record, but I really don't see a reason to leave this PR open. There is no immediate interest in incorporating ethfw into the base system. Anyway, the PR system is not really the appropriate forum for such a discussion. (Maybe -hackers, -net, or -arch (BUT NOT A CROSSPOST TO ALL THREE!).) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=17007 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message